Decoding of product codes

ABSTRACT

In one embodiment, a method includes receiving data and in an iterative process until decoded data is output or a predetermined number of full iterations have occurred: C1 decoding all first subsets of the data, determining whether to stop decoding the data after the C1 decoding, incrementing a half iteration counter to indicate completion of a half iteration, C2 decoding all second subsets of the data two or more times in each half iteration using two or more C2-decoding methods in response to a determination that a second subset is not decoded successfully using a first C2-decoding method, determining whether to stop decoding the data after the C2 decoding, incrementing the half iteration counter to indicate completion of another half iteration, and outputting the set of decoded data in response to a determination that all subsets of the data are decoded successfully.

BACKGROUND

The present invention relates to decoding data, and more specifically,this invention relates to improved decoding of data stored using productcode.

Error correction code (ECC) is widely used in magnetic tape storage andoptical storage. A particular type of ECC, product error correctioncode, provides significant gains in error rate performance by decreasingraw channel bit error rates from the range of 1×10⁻² to 1×10⁻⁴ at theinput of the ECC decoder to user bit error rates less than 1×10⁻¹⁷ to1×10⁻²⁰. This high-level of data integrity is required in linear tapeopen (LTO) and proprietary enterprise tape drives.

However, there are still some instances in which greater error reductionwould be beneficial. Therefore, enhanced decoding algorithms that allowfurther reduction in the user error rate thus providing improved errorrate performance and/or increased robustness to channel conditions in apower-efficient manner would be useful.

SUMMARY

In one embodiment, a system includes a processor and logic integratedwith and/or executable by the processor. The logic is configured tocause the processor to receive a set of data and perform an iterativeprocess until a set of decoded data is output or a predetermined numberof full iterations have occurred. The iterative process includes logicconfigured to cause the processor to C1 decode all first subsets of theset of data and determine whether to stop decoding the set of data afterthe C1 decoding. The iterative process also includes logic configured tocause the processor to increment a half iteration counter to indicatecompletion of a half iteration and C2 decode all second subsets of theset of data two or more times in each half iteration using two or moreC2-decoding methods in response to a determination that a second subsetis not decoded successfully using a first C2-decoding method. Also, theiterative process includes logic configured to cause the processor todetermine whether to stop decoding the set of data after the C2 decodingand increment the half iteration counter to indicate completion ofanother half iteration. Moreover, the iterative process includes logicconfigured to cause the processor to output the set of decoded data inresponse to a determination that all subsets of the set of data aredecoded successfully. In the iterative process, C1 decoding and C2decoding are performed on the set of data as modified by any previousdecoding attempts.

According to another embodiment, a method includes receiving a set ofdata and in an iterative process until a set of decoded data is outputor a predetermined number of full iterations have occurred: C1 decodingall first subsets of the set of data, determining whether to stopdecoding the set of data after the C1 decoding, and incrementing a halfiteration counter to indicate completion of a half iteration. Also, inthe iterative process: C2 decoding all second subsets of the set of datatwo or more times in each half iteration using two or more C2-decodingmethods in response to a determination that a second subset is notdecoded successfully using a first C2-decoding method, determiningwhether to stop decoding the set of data after the C2 decoding,incrementing the half iteration counter to indicate completion ofanother half iteration, and outputting the set of decoded data inresponse to a determination that all subsets of the set of data aredecoded successfully. C1 decoding and C2 decoding are performed on theset of data as modified by any previous decoding attempts in theiterative process.

Other aspects and embodiments of the present invention will becomeapparent from the following detailed description, which, when taken inconjunction with the drawings, illustrate by way of example theprinciples of the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1A illustrates a network storage system, according to oneembodiment.

FIG. 1B illustrates a simplified tape drive of a tape-based data storagesystem, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 2A illustrates a network architecture, in accordance with oneembodiment.

FIG. 2B shows a representative hardware environment that may beassociated with the servers and/or clients of FIG. 2A, in accordancewith one embodiment.

FIG. 3 shows a system for encoding data according to one embodiment.

FIG. 4 shows a flowchart of a method for decoding data according to oneembodiment.

FIG. 5 shows a flowchart of a method for decoding data according to oneembodiment.

FIG. 6 shows a flowchart of a method for decoding data according to oneembodiment.

FIG. 7 shows a flowchart of a method for decoding data according to oneembodiment.

FIG. 8 shows a flowchart of a method for decoding data according to oneembodiment.

FIG. 9 shows a flowchart of a method for decoding data according to oneembodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following description is made for the purpose of illustrating thegeneral principles of the present invention and is not meant to limitthe inventive concepts claimed herein. Further, particular featuresdescribed herein can be used in combination with other describedfeatures in each of the various possible combinations and permutations.

Unless otherwise specifically defined herein, all terms are to be giventheir broadest possible interpretation including meanings implied fromthe specification as well as meanings understood by those skilled in theart and/or as defined in dictionaries, treatises, etc.

It must also be noted that, as used in the specification and theappended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include pluralreferents unless otherwise specified. It will be further understood thatthe terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in thisspecification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps,operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude thepresence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps,operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.

The following description discloses several preferred embodiments ofsystems, methods, and computer program products for decoding a receivedrow or column of a product codeword up to two times per half iteration,the first time by a first type of error decoding (such as error-onlydecoding) and the second time by a second type of error decoding (suchas error-and-erasure decoding) using information from a previousiteration. Judicious use of limited decoding hardware resources areensured with this scheme, along with significant gains in performance.Specifically, error rates may be reduced by up to two orders inmagnitude or more.

In one general embodiment, a system includes a processor and logicintegrated with and/or executable by the processor, the logic beingconfigured to receive a set of data and in an iterative process until aset of decoded data is output or a predetermined number of C1 and/or C2iterations have occurred: C1 decode all first subsets of the set of datatwo or more times in each half iteration using two or more C1-decodingmethods when a first subset is not decoded successfully using a firstC1-decoding method, determine whether to stop decoding the set of dataafter the C1 decoding and output results of the C1 decoding, increment ahalf iteration counter to indicate completion of a half iteration whendecoding is not stopped, C2 decode all second subsets of the set ofdata, determine whether to stop decoding the set of data after the C2decoding and output results of the C2 decoding, increment the halfiteration counter to indicate completion of another half iteration whendecoding is not stopped, and output the set of decoded data when allsubsets of the set of data are decoded successfully, wherein C1 decodingand C2 decoding are performed on the set of data as modified by anyprevious decoding attempts.

In another general embodiment, a computer program product for decodingdata, the computer program product includes a computer readable storagemedium having program code embodied therewith, the program code beingreadable and/or executable by a processor to cause the processor to:receive by the processor a set of data and in an iterative process untila set of decoded data is output or a predetermined number of fulliterations have occurred: C1 decode all first subsets of the set ofdata, determine, by the processor, whether to stop decoding the set ofdata after the C1 decoding, increment a half iteration counter toindicate completion of a half iteration, C2 decode all second subsets ofthe set of data two or more times in each half iteration using two ormore C2-decoding methods when a second subset is not decodedsuccessfully using a first C2-decoding method, determine whether to stopdecoding the set of data after the C2 decoding, increment the halfiteration counter to indicate completion of another half iteration, andoutput the set of decoded data when all subsets of the set of data aredecoded successfully, wherein C1 decoding and C2 decoding are performedon the set of data as modified by any previous decoding attempts.

According to yet another general embodiment, a method for decoding dataincludes receiving a set of data and in an iterative process until a setof decoded data is output or a predetermined number of iterations haveoccurred: C1 decoding each C1-codeword of the set of data using a firstC1-decoding method followed by a second C1-decoding method differentfrom the first C1-decoding method when a first subset is not decodedsuccessfully using the first C1-decoding method, wherein theC1-codewords are either rows or columns of a data array representing theset of data, and wherein the second C1-decoding method uses softinformation, when available, from a previous C2 decoding of the set ofdata, determining whether an iteration limit has been reached or a setof decoded data has been produced after the C1 decoding, outputting theset of decoded data when the C1 decoding is successful, incrementing aniteration counter to indicate completion of an iteration when the C1decoding is not successful, C2 decoding each C2-codeword of the set ofdata using a first C2-decoding method followed by a second C2-decodingmethod different from the first C2-decoding method when a second subsetis not decoded successfully using the first C2-decoding method, whereinthe second C2-decoding method uses soft information from a previous C1decoding of the set of data, and wherein the C2-codewords are eitherrows or columns of the data array representing the set of data differentfrom the C1-codewords, determining whether the iteration limit has beenreached or the set of decoded data has been produced after the C2decoding, outputting the set of decoded data when the C2 decoding issuccessful, and incrementing the iteration counter to indicatecompletion of an iteration when the C2 decoding is not successful,wherein C1 decoding and C2 decoding are performed on the set of data asmodified by any previous decoding attempts.

Referring now to FIG. 1A, a schematic of a network storage system 10 isshown according to one embodiment. This network storage system 10 isonly one example of a suitable storage system and is not intended tosuggest any limitation as to the scope of use or functionality ofembodiments of the invention described herein. Regardless, networkstorage system 10 is capable of being implemented and/or performing anyof the functionality set forth hereinabove.

In the network storage system 10, there is a computer system/server 12,which is operational with numerous other general purpose or specialpurpose computing system environments or configurations. Examples ofwell-known computing systems, environments, and/or configurations thatmay be suitable for use with computer system/server 12 include, but arenot limited to, personal computer systems, server computer systems, thinclients, thick clients, handheld or laptop devices, multiprocessorsystems, microprocessor-based systems, set top boxes, programmableconsumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputer systems, mainframecomputer systems, and distributed cloud computing environments thatinclude any of the above systems or devices, and the like.

Computer system/server 12 may be described in the general context ofcomputer system-executable instructions, such as program modules, beingexecuted by a computer system. Generally, program modules may includeroutines, programs, objects, components, logic, data structures, and soon that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract datatypes. Computer system/server 12 may be practiced in distributed cloudcomputing environments where tasks are performed by remote processingdevices that are linked through a communications network. In adistributed cloud computing environment, program modules may be locatedin both local and remote computer system storage media including memorystorage devices.

As shown in FIG. 1A, computer system/server 12 in the network storagesystem 10 is shown in the form of a general-purpose computing device.The components of computer system/server 12 may include, but are notlimited to, one or more processors or processing units 16, a systemmemory 28, and a bus 18 that couples various system components includingsystem memory 28 to processor 16.

Bus 18 represents one or more of any of several types of bus structures,including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, anaccelerated graphics port, and a processor or local bus using any of avariety of bus architectures. By way of example, and not limitation,such architectures include Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus,Micro Channel Architecture (MCA) bus, Enhanced ISA (EISA) bus, VideoElectronics Standards Association (VESA) local bus, and PeripheralComponent Interconnects (PCI) bus.

Computer system/server 12 typically includes a variety of computersystem readable media. Such media may be any available media that isaccessible by computer system/server 12, and it includes both volatileand non-volatile media, removable and non-removable media.

System memory 28 may include computer system readable media in the formof volatile memory, such as random access memory (RAM) 30 and/or cachememory 32. Computer system/server 12 may further include otherremovable/non-removable, volatile/non-volatile computer system storagemedia. By way of example only, storage system 34 may be provided forreading from and writing to a non-removable, non-volatile magneticmedia—not shown and typically called a “hard disk,” which may beoperated in a hard disk drive (HDD). Although not shown, a magnetic diskdrive for reading from and writing to a removable, non-volatile magneticdisk (e.g., a “floppy disk”), and an optical disk drive for reading fromor writing to a removable, non-volatile optical disk such as a CD-ROM,DVD-ROM or other optical media may be provided. In such instances, eachmay be connected to bus 18 by one or more data media interfaces. As willbe further depicted and described below, memory 28 may include at leastone program product having a set (e.g., at least one) of program modulesthat are configured to carry out the functions of embodiments describedherein.

Program/utility 40, having a set (at least one) of program modules 42,may be stored in memory 28 by way of example, and not limitation, aswell as an operating system, one or more application programs, otherprogram modules, and program data. Each of the operating system, one ormore application programs, other program modules, and program data orsome combination thereof, may include an implementation of a networkingenvironment. Program modules 42 generally carry out the functions and/ormethodologies of embodiments of the invention as described herein.

Computer system/server 12 may also communicate with one or more externaldevices 14 such as a keyboard, a pointing device, a display 24, etc.;one or more devices that enable a user to interact with computersystem/server 12; and/or any devices (e.g., network card, modem, etc.)that enable computer system/server 12 to communicate with one or moreother computing devices. Such communication may occur via Input/Output(I/O) interfaces 22. Still yet, computer system/server 12 maycommunicate with one or more networks such as a local area network(LAN), a general wide area network (WAN), and/or a public network (e.g.,the Internet) via network adapter 20. As depicted, network adapter 20communicates with the other components of computer system/server 12 viabus 18. It should be understood that although not shown, other hardwareand/or software components could be used in conjunction with computersystem/server 12. Examples, include, but are not limited to: microcode,device drivers, redundant processing units, external disk drive arrays,RAID systems, tape drives, and data archival storage systems, etc.

FIG. 1B illustrates a simplified tape drive 100 of a tape-based datastorage system, which may be employed according to various embodiments.While one specific implementation of a tape drive is shown in FIG. 1B,it should be noted that the embodiments described herein may beimplemented in the context of any type of tape drive system.

As shown, a tape supply cartridge 120 and a take-up reel 121 areprovided to support a tape 122. One or more of the reels may form partof a removable cassette and are not necessarily part of the system 100.The tape drive, such as that illustrated in FIG. 1B, may further includedrive motor(s) to drive the tape supply cartridge 120 and the take-upreel 121 to move the tape 122 over a tape head 126 of any type.

Guides 125 guide the tape 122 across the tape head 126. Such tape head126 is in turn coupled to a controller assembly 128 via a cable 130. Thecontroller 128 typically comprises a servo channel 134 and data channel136 which includes data flow processing. It controls reel motion (notshown in FIG. 1B) and head functions, such as track following, writing,reading, etc. The cable 130 may include read/write circuits to transmitdata to the head 126 to be recorded on the tape 122 and to receive dataread by the head 126 from the tape 122. An actuator 132 moves the head126 to a set of tracks on the tape 122 in order to perform a write or aread operation.

An interface may also be provided for communication between the tapedrive 100 and a host (integral or external) to send and receive the dataand for controlling the operation of the tape drive 100 andcommunicating the status of the tape drive 100 to the host, as would beunderstood by one of skill in the art.

Error Correction Coding (ECC) is used in data storage to achieve verylow bit error rates, e.g., magnetic tape storage products are designedto ensure bit error rates in the range of 1×10⁻¹⁷ to 1×10⁻¹⁹ undernormal operating conditions. Product codes and linear block codes, suchas Reed-Solomon (RS) codes and low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes,have generally been preferred ECC schemes used in data storage products.

FIG. 2A illustrates an architecture 200, in accordance with oneembodiment. As shown in FIG. 2A, a plurality of remote networks 202 areprovided including a first remote network 203 and a second remotenetwork 204. A gateway 201 may be coupled between the remote networks202 and a proximate network 205. In the context of the presentarchitecture 200, the networks 203, 204, 205 may each take any formincluding, but not limited to a LAN, a WAN such as the Internet, publicswitched telephone network (PSTN), internal telephone network, etc.

In use, the gateway 201 serves as an entrance point from the remotenetworks 202 to the proximate network 205. As such, the gateway 201 mayfunction as a router, which is capable of directing a given packet ofdata that arrives at the gateway 201, and a switch, which furnishes theactual path in and out of the gateway 201 for a given packet.

Further included is at least one data server 207 coupled to theproximate network 205, and which is accessible from the remote networks202 via the gateway 201. It should be noted that the data server(s) 207may include any type of computing device/groupware. Coupled to each dataserver 207 is a plurality of user devices 208. Such user devices 208 mayinclude a desktop computer, lap-top computer, hand-held computer,printer or any other type of logic. It should be noted that a userdevice 206 may also be directly coupled to any of the networks, in oneembodiment.

A peripheral 209 or series of peripherals 209, e.g., facsimile machines,printers, networked and/or local storage units or systems, etc., may becoupled to one or more of the networks 203, 204, 205. It should be notedthat databases and/or additional components may be utilized with, orintegrated into, any type of network element coupled to the networks203, 204, 205. In the context of the present description, a networkelement may refer to any component of a network.

According to some approaches, methods and systems described herein maybe implemented with and/or on virtual systems and/or systems whichemulate one or more other systems, such as a UNIX system which emulatesan IBM z/OS environment, a UNIX system which virtually hosts a MICROSOFTWINDOWS environment, a MICROSOFT WINDOWS system which emulates an IBMz/OS environment, etc. This virtualization and/or emulation may beenhanced through the use of VMWARE software, in some embodiments.

In more approaches, one or more networks 203, 204, 205, may represent acluster of systems commonly referred to as a “cloud.” In cloudcomputing, shared resources, such as processing power, peripherals,software, data, servers, etc., are provided to any system in the cloudin an on-demand relationship, thereby allowing access and distributionof services across many computing systems. Cloud computing typicallyinvolves an Internet connection between the systems operating in thecloud, but other techniques of connecting the systems may also be used.

FIG. 2B shows a representative hardware environment associated with auser device 208 and/or server 207 of FIG. 2A, in accordance with oneembodiment. Such figure illustrates a typical hardware configuration ofa workstation having a central processing unit 210, such as amicroprocessor, and a number of other units interconnected via a systembus 212.

The workstation shown in FIG. 2B includes a Random Access Memory (RAM)214, Read Only Memory (ROM) 216, an I/O adapter 218 for connectingperipheral devices such as disk storage units 220 to the bus 212, a userinterface adapter 222 for connecting a keyboard 224, a mouse 226, aspeaker 228, a microphone 232, and/or other user interface devices suchas a touch screen and a digital camera (not shown) to the bus 212,communication adapter 234 for connecting the workstation to acommunication network 235 (e.g., a data processing network) and adisplay adapter 236 for connecting the bus 212 to a display device 238.

The workstation may have resident thereon an operating system such asthe Microsoft Windows® Operating System (OS), a MAC OS, a UNIX OS, etc.It will be appreciated that a preferred embodiment may also beimplemented on platforms and operating systems other than thosementioned. A preferred embodiment may be written using XML, C, and/orC++ language, or other programming languages, along with an objectoriented programming methodology. Object oriented programming (OOP),which has become increasingly used to develop complex applications, maybe used.

Conventionally, RS encoders at a transmitter (a write side in thecontext of data storage) take a number of information symbols (K) at aninput of the encoder, where each symbol consists of a number of bits(m), with a preferred choice for the size of m being eight, e.g., in oneembodiment, m=8, with the symbols being bytes. The RS encoder thengenerates, in a first step, a number of N−K symbols, which are known as“parity symbols,” “overhead,” or “redundancy,” as a linear function ofthe K input symbols and appends, in a second step, the generated (N−K)parity symbols at an end of the K information symbols to obtain anN-symbol RS codeword where N>K. Note that for typical RS codes, N<2^(m),whereas for extended RS codes, N=2^(m) or N=2^(m)+1. Therefore, ingeneral, N<2^(m)+2.

This is referred to as generating code words from a RS(N,K) code. Theminimum Hamming distance (d) of a RS(N,K) code is d=N−K+1. This meansthat any two RS(N,K) code words differ by d or more symbols, where thereare a total of (2^(m))^(K) RS(N,K) code words. RS(N,K) codes may also bereferred to as RS(N,K,d) codes, thereby including the indication of theminimum Hamming distance in the notation. The m-bit symbols of an RScode are from a Galois field (GF) with 2^(m) symbols. Therefore, RScodes may also be referred to as RS(N,K,d) codes over GF(2^(m)). The RSparity symbols may be generated using a linear feedback shift registercircuit, or some other technique known in the art. A RS encoder whichappends generated parity symbols to the information symbols is known inthe art as a “systematic encoder.”

A RS decoder for a RS(N,K,d) code over GF(2^(m)) at a receiver (a readside in the context of data storage) is capable of correcting t symbols,where t=floor((N−K)/2). In other words, up to t symbols in an N-symbolRS code word may be corrupted and the RS decoder is still capable ofcorrecting these t erroneous m-bit symbols, where each erroneous m-bitsymbol contains at least 1 bit error and at most m bit errors. This RSdecoder has an error correction capability of t. Sometimes, the RSdecoder may use additional information about locations of erroneoussymbols within a code word. In other words, the RS decoder is aware ofwhich symbols are in error but does not know how many bits, nor whichbits in the erroneous symbols are wrong. This is the case for erasurecorrection. The RS decoder is capable of correcting up to e erasedsymbols, where e=(N−K). In this case, the RS decoder is aware oflocations of the erroneous symbols. In general, the RS decoder iscapable of correcting e′ erased symbols and t′ erroneous symbols withunknown locations when (e′+2t′)<d, where d=(N−K+1).

If there are t=floor((N−K)/2) or less erroneous symbols (or e=(N−K) orless erased symbols) in a RS code word (in the most general case:(e′+2t′)<d=(N−K+1)), a bounded-distance RS decoder (in practice, most RSdecoders are of a bounded-distance type) corrects all erroneous symbolsand erased symbols. If there are more than t erroneous symbols (or morethan e erased symbols) in a RS code word (in the most general case:(e′+2t′)>(N−K)), two things may occur at the output of thebounded-distance RS decoder.

The most likely occurrence is that the RS decoder raises a decodingfailure flag which indicates that the total number of erroneous symbolsand erased symbols exceeds the error correction capability of the RSdecoder. In a less likely outcome, the total number of erroneous symbolsand erased symbols may cause the receiver's corrupted RS code word tobecome very close to another RS code word and the RS decoder may correctthe errors and the erased symbols and output an erroneous RS code word.In this case, a “miscorrection” occurred and the RS decoder is not awarethat a mistake was made. The most likely miscorrection case is when thedecoded RS code word differs in d=N−K+1 symbols from the original RScode word. Finally, the RS decoder drops the parity symbols from thedecoded RS code word to recover the information symbols.

Now referring to FIG. 3, a system 300 for encoding data in a tape drivewith M simultaneously written tracks is shown, including the operationsof a cyclic redundancy check (CRC) encoder 302, a compression module304, an optional encryption module 306, a product error correction code(ECC) encoder module 308, a multiplexer 310 for adding one or moreheaders 312 to encoded data, and tape layout addition module 314,according to one embodiment. The system 300 also includes scrambling(e.g., randomizers 1 to M adapted for data randomization in eachchannel) 316, . . . , 318, modulation (Mod.) encoder modules 320, . . ., 322, which may utilize run-length limited (RLL) encoding, individualchannel multiplexers 324, . . . , 326 for inserting synchronizationinformation 328, . . . , 330 for each track 1, . . . , M. Any number oftracks may be written to a magnetic medium, such as 4 tracks, 8 tracks,16 tracks, 32 tracks, 64 tracks, etc. Furthermore, any type of storagemedium may be used, such as magnetic tape, optical disk (such as CD-ROM,DVD-ROM, Blu-Ray, etc.), hard disk, etc.

In one approach, the storage medium may be a magnetic tape, and thesystem 300 may comprise logic adapted for parsing the encoded data intoa plurality of tracks prior to writing the encoded data to the magnetictape, such as the tape layout addition module 314, in one embodiment.

In FIG. 3, the ECC encoder module 308 may be used for inserting aproduct code into sub data sets (SDS). In the following descriptions,most of these operations are not shown to simplify description as the C1parity and C2 parity in the ECC encoding are the focus of thedescriptions. However, any of the descriptions herein may includeadditional operations not depicted, but described in other figures. InFIG. 3, a forward concatenation architecture is shown where modulationencoding follows error correction coding. In the case of forwardconcatenation, modulation decoding precedes error correction decoding atthe receiver. In various embodiments, the methods and systems describedherein for improved decoding of product codes may be used in a forwardconcatenation setting or in a reverse concatenation setting wheremodulation encoding precedes error correction coding. In the case ofreverse concatenation, modulation decoding follows error correctiondecoding at the receiver.

In product codes, every row and every column in a data array formedafter encoding is a code word, regardless of the order in which the C1encoding and the C2 encoding is applied. The distance of a product codeis the product of the distances of its component codes, hence the nameproduct code. Therefore, a 6×8 array of data which is first C1 encoded(with 6 byte row parity) will become a 6×14 row-encoded array, whichafter C2 encoding (with 4 byte column parity) will become a 10×14encoded array (referred to as a [140,48,35] product code). Similarly,the same 6×8 array of data which is first C2 encoded (with 4 byte columnparity) will become a 10×8 column-encoded array, which after C1 encoding(with 6 byte row parity) will become a 10×14 encoded array identical tothat obtained from the C1/C2 encoding, i.e., a [140,48,35] product code.

A C1 code is a linear code which may be described as a [N1,K1,D1] code,where N1 is the codeword length (number of symbols), K1 is the datalength (number of symbols), D1 is the minimum Hamming distance, with P1being the parity length where P1=N1−K1 (number of symbols). The Hammingdistance between two codewords is defined as the distance (amount ofbytes) which are different between two codewords. A Reed-Solomon (RS)code may be described as a RS(N1,K1) code with a minimum Hammingdistance of D1=N1−K1+1. The C1 code may be either the row code or thecolumn code. Additionally, the parameter M1 may be selected such thatM1<D1+1, in one embodiment.

A C2 code is another linear code which may be described as a [N2,K2,D2]code, where N2 is the codeword length (number of symbols), K2 is thedata length (number of symbols), D2 is the minimum Hamming distance,with P2 being the parity length where P2=N2−K2 (number of symbols). TheRS code may be described as a RS(N2,K2) code with a minimum Hammingdistance of D2=N2−K2+1. The C2 code may be either the row code or thecolumn code. Also, the parameter M2 may be selected such that M2<D2+1,in one embodiment.

In one embodiment, in order to improve error rate performance which maybe achieved using iterative error-only decoding of product codes anditerative error-and-erasure decoding of product codes, an iterativedecoding scheme is presented which utilizes a first decoding typefollowed by a second decoding type, with the first decoding type beingdifferent than the second decoding type. Any suitable decoding typesknown in the art may be used, such as error-only decoding,error-and-erasure decoding, Guruswami-Sudan list (GS) decoding,Welch-Berlekamp (WB) decoding, Sudan decoding, etc.

Information regarding GS decoding may be found in V. Guruswami and M.Sudan, “Improved Decoding of Reed-Solomon Codes and Algebraic GeometryCodes,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1757-1767,September 1999.

Information regarding WB decoding may be found in Welch et al., U.S.Pat. No. 4,633,470, issued Dec. 30, 1986, which is herein incorporatedby reference.

Also, information regarding Sudan decoding may be found in M. Sudan,“Decoding of Reed-Solomon Codes beyond the Error-Correction Bound,” J.Complexity, vol. 13, pp. 180-193, 1997.

By decoding a received row or a received column of a product codeword(up to two times or more per half iteration), rather than only once perhalf iteration as is typical of iterative schemes, more data is able tobe recovered in each half iteration, thereby resulting in improved errorrate performance. Specifically, error rates may be reduced by up to twoorders in magnitude in comparison to typical iterative schemes.

In one particular embodiment, in each iteration, the row or column maybe decoded a first time in each half iteration by error-only decodingand a second time by error-and-erasure decoding using information from aprevious iteration. Various embodiments of this general scheme arepossible including embodiments that account for a judicious use oflimited decoding hardware resources.

Now referring to FIG. 4, a flowchart of a method 400 for decoding datais shown according to one embodiment. Method 400 may be executed in anydesired environment, including those shown in FIGS. 1A-3, among others.Furthermore, more or less operations than those specifically describedin FIG. 4 may be included in method 400.

In operation 402, a set of data is received, a first half iterationcounter is set to zero (it_(1/2)=0), and a second list (L2) is receivedfrom a previous decoding attempt populated with information from thatdecoding attempt, or initialized so that a number of elements in thesecond list is greater than a first integer variable (M1) minus one,e.g., |L2|>M1−1. In this way, it is ensured that M1 is less than orequal to D1.

For each half iteration that is completed, the half iteration counter(it_(1/2)) will be incremented by one to track the completion of thehalf iteration. Therefore, a full iteration is reflected on the halfiteration counter by 2. Any method for tracking which half iteration(and therefore which full iteration) has been completed may be used, aswould be understood by one of skill in the art.

In a preferred embodiment, the set of data may be a data array, whichincludes encoded data of a data set, file, etc., in a structure in whichthe data may be manipulated, encoded, decoded, etc. A data arrayincludes a plurality of rows and a plurality of columns, each row orcolumn representing a subset of data. It does not matter whether thefirst subset of data is a row or column, as the encoding scheme used maybe decoded from the rows first, and then the columns, or vice versa,while arriving at the same decoded array of data, due to the nature ofthe product codes used to encode/decode the data array.

In operation 404, each first subset of data is C1 decoded using anysuitable C1-decoding scheme known in the art (and compatible with thecode which was used to encode the data into the data array previously),to produce a C1-decoded set of data (as all first subsets of data areC1-decoded). When operation 404 is executed a first time, block 404operates on each first subset of received data. When operation 404 isexecuted again (a second time, a third time, etc.), operation 404 isperformed on each first subset of decoded data corresponding to thearray obtained as a result of C2 decoding which is produced in operation410.

Clearly, if a first subset of data (e.g., a row or a column) has alreadybeen successfully C1 decoded during a previous iteration and no symbolin this decoded first subset of data has been corrected (changed) duringa subsequent C2 decoding, this first subset of data does not have to bedecoded again because it is a permitted codeword (it has beensuccessfully decoded before and not changed). Note that whenever a rowor column is decoded successfully, the decoder produces a permittedcodeword. However, it may still be a different permitted codeword thanan original codeword because too many errors happened. This case isknown as miscorrection. This results in three possible cases: 1) correctsuccessful decoding; 2) decoding failure (decoder leaves the erroneouscodeword unchanged and indicates that it is unable to correct thecodeword); and 3) miscorrection (decoder produces a permitted codewordbut not the correct original codeword).

According to one embodiment, operation 404 may include the functionalityof some or all of the operations in FIG. 5, which depicts a C1-decodingmethod 500, according to one embodiment.

In another embodiment, operation 404 may include the functionality ofsome or all of the operations of FIG. 7, which depicts a C1-decodingmethod 700, according to one embodiment.

Referring again to FIG. 4, in operation 406, it is determined whether tocontinue decoding the set of data. When it is decided to stop decodingthe data set, method 400 ends and results of the C1 decoding, such asthe decoded set of data is output, stored, passed to another module,etc. When it is decided to continue decoding, method 400 continues tooperation 408.

In one embodiment, the decision to continue decoding may be based on anumber of errors that remain in each of the C1-decoded subsets of theset of data (such as in C1-decoded rows or columns of the data array),along with a known number of correctable errors that may be corrected ineach of the first subsets of data, based on the encoding/decodingschemes being used in this particular set of data.

In another embodiment, the decision to continue decoding may be based ondetermining whether all C1-decoded subsets of the set of data arepermitted C1-codewords, and whether all C2-decoded subsets of the set ofdata are permitted C2-codewords.

For example, when C1-codewords are rows of a data array, andC2-codewords are columns of the data array, the decision to continuedecoding may be based on whether all decoded rows are permitted rowcodewords and all decoded columns are permitted column codewords (bypermitted, what is meant is that each codeword is valid and data withineach codeword is able to be successfully decoded). This decision may bemade after a row or column is decoded using one of the decoding methods.

In this embodiment, when no more than a correctable number of errorsremain in each of the C1-decoded subsets of data after C1-decoding,method 400 ends, the remaining errors are corrected, and the C1-decodedset of data is output, stored, passed to another module, etc. When morethan a correctable number of errors remain in one or more of theC1-decoded subsets of data, method 400 continues to operation 408.

Specifically, when the first subsets of data are rows in the data array,it is known how many errors may be corrected in each row based on theencoding/decoding schemes being used. Therefore, as long as no moreerrors than the known number of correctable errors are present in eachrow of the data array, then all errors in the rows of the data array maybe corrected, and therefore no more decoding is necessary. In otherwords, when the first subsets of data are rows in the data array, whenall rows may be successfully C1-decoded, method 400 ends and the decodeddata array is output.

Similarly, when the first subsets of data are columns in the data array,it is known how many errors may be corrected in each column based on theencoding/decoding schemes being used. Therefore, as long as no moreerrors than the known number of correctable errors are present in eachcolumn of the data array, then all errors in the columns of the dataarray may be corrected, and therefore no more decoding is necessary. Inother words, when the first subsets of data are columns in the dataarray, when all columns may be successfully C1 decoded, method 400 endsand the decoded data array is output.

In operation 408, the half iteration counter (it_(1/2)) is incrementedby one (it_(1/2)=it_(1/2)+1) indicating execution of one half iteration.Any method for tracking which half iteration (and therefore which fulliteration) has been completed may be used, as would be understood by oneof skill in the art. In implementation, the current half iteration istracked, regardless of the method used to track the half and/or fulliterations.

In operation 410, each second subset of the set of data is C2 decodedusing any suitable C2-decoding scheme known in the art (and compatiblewith the code which was used to encode the data into the data arraypreviously), to produce a C2-decoded set of data (as all second subsetsof data are C2-decoded). When operation 410 is executed, operation 410is performed on each second subset of decoded data corresponding to thearray obtained as a result of C1 decoding performed in operation 404.

Clearly, if a second subset of data (e.g., a row or a column) hasalready been successfully C2 decoded during a previous iteration and nosymbol in this decoded second subset of data has been corrected(changed) during a subsequent C1 decoding, this second subset of datadoes not have to be decoded again because it is a permitted codeword (ithas been successfully decoded before and not changed). Note thatwhenever a row or column is decoded successfully, the decoder produces apermitted codeword. However, it may still be a different permittedcodeword than an original codeword because too many errors happened.This case is known as miscorrection. This results in three possiblecases: 1) correct successful decoding; 2) decoding failure (decoderleaves the erroneous codeword unchanged and indicates that it is unableto correct the codeword); and 3) miscorrection (decoder produces apermitted codeword but not the correct original codeword).

According to one embodiment, operation 410 may include the functionalityof some or all of the operations of FIG. 6, which depicts a C2-decodingmethod 600, according to one embodiment.

In another embodiment, operation 410 may include the functionality ofsome or all of the operations of FIG. 8, which depicts a C2-decodingmethod 800, according to another embodiment.

Referring again to FIG. 4, in operation 412, it is determined whether tocontinue decoding the set of data. When it is decided to stop decoding,method 400 ends and results of the C2 decoding, such as the decoded setof data is output, stored, passed to another module, etc. When it isdecided to continue decoding, method 400 continues to operation 414.

In one embodiment, the decision to continue decoding may be based on anumber of errors that remain in each of the C2-decoded subsets of data(such as in each C2-decoded row or column of the data array), along witha known number of correctable errors that may be corrected in eachsecond subset of data, based on the encoding/decoding schemes being usedin this particular set of data.

In this embodiment, when no more than a correctable number of errorsremain in each of the C2-decoded subsets of data after C2-decoding,method 400 ends, the remaining errors are corrected, and the decoded setof data is output, stored, passed to another module, etc. When more thana correctable number of errors remain in one or more of the C2-decodedsubsets of data, method 400 continues to operation 414.

Specifically, when the second subsets of data are rows in the data array(so that the first subsets of data are columns), it is known how manyerrors may be corrected in each row based on the encoding/decodingschemes being used. Therefore, as long as no more errors than the knownnumber of correctable errors are present in each row of the data array,then all errors in the rows of the data array may be corrected, andtherefore no more decoding is necessary. In other words, when the secondsubsets of data are rows in the data array, when all rows may besuccessfully C2 decoded, method 400 ends and the decoded data array isoutput.

Similarly, when the second subsets of data are columns in the data array(so that the first subsets of data are rows), it is known how manyerrors may be corrected in each column based on the encoding/decodingschemes being used. Therefore, as long as no more errors than the knownnumber of correctable errors are present in each column of the dataarray, then all errors in the columns of the data array may becorrected, and therefore no more decoding is necessary. In other words,when the second subsets of data are columns in the data array, when allcolumns may be successfully C2 decoded, method 400 ends and theC2-decoded data array is output.

In operation 414, the half iteration counter (it_(1/2)) is incrementedby one (it_(1/2)=it_(1/2)+1) indicating execution of another halfiteration. In method 400, the half iteration counter (it_(1/2)) nowindicates a value of 2, as two half iterations have been completed.Method 400 then returns to operation 404 to perform another iteration ofC1-decoding on the set of data.

Any method for tracking which half iteration (and therefore which fulliteration) has been completed may be used, as would be understood by oneof skill in the art. In implementation, the current half iteration istracked, regardless of the method used to track the half and/or fulliterations.

In one embodiment, method 400 along with the C1-decoding and C2-decodingmethods depicted in FIGS. 5-6 may be utilized for systems where anoptimum error rate is preferred, regardless of the cost in terms ofresources.

In another embodiment, method 400 in FIG. 4 along with the C1-decodingand C2-decoding methods depicted in FIGS. 7-8 may be utilized forsystems where limited resources are available, but improved error rateperformance is desired.

Now referring to FIG. 5, a flowchart of a method 500 for C1 decodingdata is shown according to one embodiment. Method 500 may be executed inany desired environment, including those shown in FIGS. 1A-4, amongothers. Furthermore, more or less operations than those specificallydescribed in FIG. 5 may be included in method 500.

In operation 502, a C1-iteration counter (i) is initialized and set tozero (i=0) and a first list (L1) is set to empty (L1={ }). Any method oftracking a number of iterations used in C1-decoding method 500 may beused, as would be apparent to one of skill in the art.

In one embodiment, the first list (L1) may be used to store the list ofrows and/or columns of the data array which fail to decode.

In operation 504, an i^(th) C1-codeword is decoded using a firstdecoding method. The first decoding method may be any decoding methodknown in the art to be compatible with C1 codes, such as error-onlydecoding, error-and-erasure decoding, GS decoding, etc.

When any type of decoding is used where erasures are made, the locationsof these erasures are stored in the second list (L2) for the i^(th)codeword. In this way, the second list (L2) may be used to store thelist of locations in rows and/or columns of the data array which havebeen erased.

In operation 506, it is determined whether the first decoding of thei^(th) C1-codeword failed. When the first decoding of the i^(th)C1-codeword fails, method 500 continues to operation 508; otherwise,method 500 jumps to operation 516.

Any method of detecting failure known in the art may be used, such asdetermining that one or more errors remain in the C1-codeword afterfirst C1-decoding thereof, that more than a correctable number of errorsremain in the C1-codeword prior to attempting to correct errors, etc.

In operation 508, it is determined whether the number of elements in thesecond list (L2) is less than the first integer variable (M1), e.g.,|L2|<M1. When the number of elements in the second list (L2) is lessthan the first integer variable (M1), method 500 continues to operation510; otherwise, method 500 jumps to operation 514.

In operation 510, the i^(th) C1-codeword is decoded using a seconddecoding method. The second decoding method may be any decoding methoddifferent from the first decoding method that is known in the art to becompatible with C1 codes, such as error-only decoding, error-and-erasuredecoding, GS decoding, WB decoding, etc.

For example, when the first decoding method is error-only decoding, thesecond decoding method may be error-and-erasure decoding, WB decoding,Sudan decoding, etc. Conversely, when the first decoding method iserror-and-erasure decoding, the second decoding method may be error-onlydecoding, GS decoding, etc.

When any type of decoding is used where erasures are made, the locationof these erasures are stored in the second list (L2) for the i^(th)codeword.

In operation 512, it is determined whether the second decoding of thei^(th) C1-codeword failed. When the second decoding of the i^(th)C1-codeword fails, method 500 continues to operation 514; otherwise,method 500 jumps to operation 516.

Any method of detecting failure known in the art may be used, such asdetermining that one or more errors remain in the C1-codeword aftersecond C1-decoding thereof, that more than a correctable number oferrors remain in the C1-codeword prior to attempting to correct errors,etc.

In operation 514, the first list (L1) has a location of the i^(th)C1-codeword added thereto, e.g., L1=L1∪{i}. In this way, the location ofeach C1-codeword which fails to decode successfully will be saved to thefirst list for use in later decoding attempts.

In operation 516, the C1-iteration counter (i) is incremented by one(i=i+1) indicating execution of a C1 iteration. Any method for trackinghow many C1 iterations have been completed may be used, as would beunderstood by one of skill in the art. In implementation, the current C1iteration is tracked, regardless of the method used to track the C1iterations.

In operation 518, it is determined whether the C1-iteration counter (i)is less than a number of C1-codewords (N2), e.g., i<N2. In this way, itis ensured that all C1-codewords are decoded two times (or more, in someembodiments), when not decoded successfully in a single decoding step.When the C1-iteration counter is less than the number of C1-codewords,method 500 returns to operation 504 to decode a next C1-codeword;otherwise, method 500 continues to operation 406.

In some embodiments, method 500 may be repeated one or more times inorder to attempt to successfully decode each C1-codeword when allC1-codewords are not able to be decoded successfully after two decodingmethods in operations 504 and 510.

Now referring to FIG. 6, a flowchart of a method 600 for C2 decodingdata is shown according to one embodiment. Method 600 may be executed inany desired environment, including those shown in FIGS. 1A-4, amongothers. Furthermore, more or less operations than those specificallydescribed in FIG. 6 may be included in method 600.

In operation 602, a C2-iteration counter (j) is initialized and set tozero (j=0) and a second list (L2) is set to empty (L2={ }). Any methodof tracking a number of iterations used in C2-decoding method 600 may beused, as would be apparent to one of skill in the art.

In one embodiment, the second list (L2) may be used to store the list ofrows and/or columns of the data array which fail to decode.

In operation 604, a j^(th) C2-codeword is decoded using a first decodingmethod. The first decoding method may be any decoding method known inthe art to be compatible with C2 codes, such as error-only decoding,error-and-erasure decoding, GS decoding, etc.

When any type of decoding is used where erasures are made, the locationsof these erasures are stored in the first list (L1) for the j^(th)codeword. In this way, the first list (L1) may be used to store the listof locations in rows and/or columns of the data array which have beenerased.

In operation 606, it is determined whether the first decoding of thej^(th) C2-codeword failed. When the first decoding of the j^(th)C2-codeword fails, method 600 continues to operation 608; otherwise,method 600 jumps to operation 616.

Any method of detecting failure known in the art may be used, such asdetermining that one or more errors remain in the C2-codeword afterfirst C2-decoding thereof, that more than a correctable number of errorsremain in the C2-codeword prior to attempting to correct errors, etc.

In operation 608, it is determined whether the number of elements in thefirst list (L1) is less than the second integer variable (M2), e.g.,|L1|<M2. When the number of elements in the first list (L1) is less thanthe second integer variable (M2), method 600 continues to operation 610;otherwise, method 600 jumps to operation 614.

In operation 610, the j^(th) C2-codeword is decoded using a seconddecoding method. The second decoding method may be any decoding methoddifferent from the first decoding method that is known in the art to becompatible with C2 codes, such as error-only decoding, error-and-erasuredecoding, GS decoding, WB decoding, etc.

For example, when the first decoding method is error-only decoding, thesecond decoding method may be error-and-erasure decoding, WB decoding,Sudan decoding, etc. Conversely, when the first decoding method iserror-and-erasure decoding, the second decoding method may be error-onlydecoding, GS decoding, etc.

When any type of decoding is used where erasures are made, the locationof these erasures are stored in the first list (L1) for the j^(th)codeword.

In operation 612, it is determined whether the second decoding of thej^(th) C2-codeword failed. When the second decoding of the j^(th)C2-codeword fails, method 600 continues to operation 614; otherwise,method 600 jumps to operation 616.

Any method of detecting failure known in the art may be used, such asdetermining that one or more errors remain in the C2-codeword aftersecond C2-decoding thereof, that more than a correctable number oferrors remain in the C2-codeword prior to attempting to correct errors,etc.

In operation 614, the second list (L2) has a location of the j^(th)C2-codeword added thereto, e.g., L2=L2∪{j}. In this way, the location ofeach C2-codeword which fails to decode successfully will be saved to thesecond list for use in later decoding attempts.

In operation 616, the C2-iteration counter (j) is incremented by one(j=j+1) indicating execution of a C2 iteration. Any method for trackinghow many C2 iterations have been completed may be used, as would beunderstood by one of skill in the art. In implementation, the current C2iteration is tracked, regardless of the method used to track the C2iterations.

In operation 618, it is determined whether the C2-iteration counter (j)is less than a number of C2-codewords (N1), e.g., j<N1. In this way, itis ensured that all C2-codewords are decoded two times (or more, in someembodiments), when not decoded successfully in a single decoding step.When the C2-iteration counter is less than the number of C2-codewords,method 600 returns to operation 604 to decode a next C2-codeword;otherwise, method 600 continues to operation 406.

In some embodiments, method 600 may be repeated one or more times inorder to attempt to successfully decode each C2-codeword when allC2-codewords are not able to be decoded successfully after two decodingmethods in operations 604 and 610.

Now referring to FIG. 7, a flowchart of a method 700 for C1 decodingdata is shown according to one embodiment. Method 700 may be executed inany desired environment, including those shown in FIGS. 1A-4, amongothers. Furthermore, more or less operations than those specificallydescribed in FIG. 7 may be included in method 700.

In operation 702, a first list (L1) is set to empty (L1={ }). In oneembodiment, the first list (L1) may be used to store the list of rowsand/or columns of the data array which fail to decode.

In operation 704, all C1-codewords are decoded using a first decodingmethod. The first decoding method may be any decoding method known inthe art to be compatible with C1 codes, such as error-only decoding,error-and-erasure decoding, GS decoding, etc.

In operation 706, a first failure variable (P1) is initiated andpopulated with a number of C1-codewords that failed to be error decodedusing the first decoding method. For example, when three C1-codewordsfail to be error decoded, P1=3.

In operation 708, a second decoding method is used to decode a subset(E1) of P1 codewords with erasure locations as stored in L2 when thenumber of elements in the second list (L2) is less than the firstinteger variable (M1), e.g., |L2|<M1.

In operation 710, the first list (L1) is updated to include a list ofall C1-codewords that failed to decode during this iteration ofdecoding.

In one embodiment, the first decoding method may be error-only decodingwhile the second decoding method may be error-and-erasure decoding, andthe C1-codewords which were unable to be decoded with error-onlydecoding are marked so that in error-and-erasure decoding, theseC1-codewords may be decoded with erasures.

Now referring to FIG. 8, a flowchart of a method 800 for C2 decodingdata is shown according to one embodiment. Method 800 may be executed inany desired environment, including those shown in FIGS. 1A-4, amongothers. Furthermore, more or less operations than those specificallydescribed in FIG. 8 may be included in method 800.

In operation 802, a second list (L2) is set to empty (L2={ }). In oneembodiment, the second list (L2) may be used to store the list of rowsand/or columns of the data array which fail to decode.

In operation 804, all C2-codewords are decoded using a first decodingmethod. The first decoding method may be any decoding method known inthe art to be compatible with C2 codes, such as error-only decoding,error-and-erasure decoding, GS decoding, etc.

In operation 806, a second failure variable (P2) is initiated andpopulated with a number of C2-codewords that failed to be error decodedusing the first decoding method. For example, when five C2-codewordsfail to be error decoded, P2=5.

In operation 808, a second decoding method is used to decode a subset(E2) of P2 codewords with erasure locations as stored in L1 when thenumber of elements in the first list (L1) is less than the secondinteger variable (M2), e.g., |L1|<M2.

In operation 810, the second list (L2) is updated to include a list ofall C2-codewords that failed to decode during this iteration ofdecoding.

In one embodiment, the first decoding method may be error-only decodingwhile the second decoding method may be error-and-erasure decoding, andthe C2-codewords which were unable to be decoded with error-onlydecoding are marked so that in error-and-erasure decoding, theseC2-codewords may be decoded with erasures.

Now referring to FIG. 9, a flowchart of a method 900 for decoding datais shown according to one embodiment. Method 900 may be executed in anydesired environment, including those shown in FIGS. 1A-4, among others.Furthermore, more or less operations than those specifically describedin FIG. 9 may be included in method 900.

In operation 902, a set of data is received. The set of data may berepresented by a data array having rows and columns, with each row beinga codeword that may include erroneous symbols and each column being acodeword that may include erroneous symbols. At the output of theencoder, each row is a codeword and each column is a codeword. Duringtransmission or storage, symbol errors may occur and therefore at thereceiver, rows and columns may not be permitted codewords because theyinclude erroneous symbols. A purpose of the decoder is to correct theseerrors.

Operations 904-918 are repeated in an iterative process until a set ofdecoded data is output or a predetermined number of iterations haveoccurred. The predetermined number of iterations may be any whole numberfrom 1 to 10, according to various embodiments, with a preferred numberof iterations totaling 2 or less.

Furthermore, C1 decoding and C2 decoding are performed on the set ofdata as modified by any previous decoding attempts, and the only timethat the received set of data is processed is in the first C1 decodingattempt in operation 904.

In operation 904, each C1-codeword of the set of data is C1 decodedusing a first C1-decoding method followed by a second C1-decoding methoddifferent from the first C1-decoding method when a first subset is notdecoded successfully using the first C1-decoding method. In this way,each C1-codeword is decoded once in one way, and then again in anotherway, providing increased chances of decoding the codeword successfully.The C1-codewords are either rows or columns of a data array representingthe set of data, and the second C1-decoding method uses softinformation, when available, from a previous C2 decoding of the set ofdata (e.g., C2 decoding has been performed on the set of data and thisis not the first iteration of the method 900).

In operation 906, it is determined whether an iteration limit has beenreached or a set of decoded data has been produced after the C1decoding. When either of these conditions are satisfied, method 900ends.

In operation 908, the set of decoded data is output, stored,transferred, copied, etc., when the C1 decoding is successful. Thisproduces a set of decoded data, and method 900 is no longer needed toexecute, and therefore ends.

In operation 910, an iteration counter is incremented to indicatecompletion of an iteration when the C1 decoding is not successful andmethod 900 continues.

In operation 912, each C2-codeword of the set of data is C2 decodedusing a first C2-decoding method followed by a second C2-decoding methoddifferent from the first C2-decoding method when a second subset is notdecoded successfully using the first C2-decoding method. The secondC2-decoding method uses soft information from a previous C1 decoding ofthe set of data, such as in operation 904. The C2-codewords are eitherrows or columns of the data array representing the set of data differentfrom the C1-codewords (e.g., when the C1-codewords are rows, theC2-codewords are columns, and vice versa).

In operation 914, it is determined whether the iteration limit has beenreached or the set of decoded data has been produced after the C2decoding. When either of these conditions are satisfied, method 900ends.

In operation 916, the set of decoded data is output, stored,transferred, copied, etc., when the C2 decoding is successful. Thisproduces a set of decoded data, and method 900 is no longer needed toexecute, and therefore ends.

In operation 918, the iteration counter is incremented to indicatecompletion of an iteration when the C2 decoding is not successful andmethod 900 continues by returning to operation 904.

In one embodiment, the first C1-decoding method and the firstC2-decoding method may comprise error-only decoding. Furthermore, thesecond C1-decoding method and the second C2-decoding method may compriseerror-and-erasure decoding.

The present invention may be a system, a method, and/or a computerprogram product. The computer program product may include a computerreadable storage medium (or media) having computer readable programinstructions thereon for causing a processor to carry out aspects of thepresent invention.

The computer readable storage medium can be a tangible device that canretain and store instructions for use by an instruction executiondevice. The computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but isnot limited to, an electronic storage device, a magnetic storage device,an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, asemiconductor storage device, or any suitable combination of theforegoing. A non-exhaustive list of more specific examples of thecomputer readable storage medium includes the following: a portablecomputer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), aread-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROMor Flash memory), a static random access memory (SRAM), a portablecompact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD),a memory stick, a floppy disk, a mechanically encoded device such aspunch-cards or raised structures in a groove having instructionsrecorded thereon, and any suitable combination of the foregoing. Acomputer readable storage medium, as used herein, is not to be construedas being transitory signals per se, such as radio waves or other freelypropagating electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic waves propagatingthrough a waveguide or other transmission media (e.g., light pulsespassing through a fiber-optic cable), or electrical signals transmittedthrough a wire.

Computer readable program instructions described herein can bedownloaded to respective computing/processing devices from a computerreadable storage medium or to an external computer or external storagedevice via a network, for example, the Internet, a local area network, awide area network and/or a wireless network. The network may comprisecopper transmission cables, optical transmission fibers, wirelesstransmission, routers, firewalls, switches, gateway computers and/oredge servers. A network adapter card or network interface in eachcomputing/processing device receives computer readable programinstructions from the network and forwards the computer readable programinstructions for storage in a computer readable storage medium withinthe respective computing/processing device.

Computer readable program instructions for carrying out operations ofthe present invention may be assembler instructions,instruction-set-architecture (ISA) instructions, machine instructions,machine dependent instructions, microcode, firmware instructions,state-setting data, or either source code or object code written in anycombination of one or more programming languages, including an objectoriented programming language such as Smalltalk, C++ or the like, andconventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C”programming language or similar programming languages. The computerreadable program instructions may execute entirely on the user'scomputer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone softwarepackage, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computeror entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario,the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through anytype of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide areanetwork (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer(for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).In some embodiments, electronic circuitry including, for example,programmable logic circuitry, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), orprogrammable logic arrays (PLA) may execute the computer readableprogram instructions by utilizing state information of the computerreadable program instructions to personalize the electronic circuitry,in order to perform aspects of the present invention.

Aspects of the present invention are described herein with reference toflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus(systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of theinvention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchartillustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in theflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented bycomputer readable program instructions.

These computer readable program instructions may be provided to aprocessor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, orother programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, suchthat the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computeror other programmable data processing apparatus, create means forimplementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or blockdiagram block or blocks. These computer readable program instructionsmay also be stored in a computer readable storage medium that can directa computer, a programmable data processing apparatus, and/or otherdevices to function in a particular manner, such that the computerreadable storage medium having instructions stored therein comprises anarticle of manufacture including instructions which implement aspects ofthe function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram blockor blocks.

The computer readable program instructions may also be loaded onto acomputer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other deviceto cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer,other programmable apparatus or other device to produce a computerimplemented process, such that the instructions which execute on thecomputer, other programmable apparatus, or other device implement thefunctions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block orblocks.

The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate thearchitecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementationsof systems, methods, and computer program products according to variousembodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in theflowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portionof instructions, which comprises one or more executable instructions forimplementing the specified logical function(s). In some alternativeimplementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of theorder noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in successionmay, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks maysometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon thefunctionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of theblock diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocksin the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implementedby special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specifiedfunctions or acts or carry out combinations of special purpose hardwareand computer instructions.

Moreover, a system according to various embodiments may include aprocessor and logic integrated with and/or executable by the processor,the logic being configured to perform one or more of the process stepsrecited herein. By integrated with, what is meant is that the processorhas logic embedded therewith as hardware logic, such as an applicationspecific integrated circuit (ASIC), a FPGA, etc. By executable by theprocessor, what is meant is that the logic is hardware logic; softwarelogic such as firmware, part of an operating system, part of anapplication program; etc., or some combination of hardware and softwarelogic that is accessible by the processor and configured to cause theprocessor to perform some functionality upon execution by the processor.Software logic may be stored on local and/or remote memory of any memorytype, as known in the art. Any processor known in the art may be used,such as a software processor module and/or a hardware processor such asan ASIC, a FPGA, a central processing unit (CPU), an integrated circuit(IC), a graphics processing unit (GPU), etc.

It will be clear that the various features of the foregoing systemsand/or methodologies may be combined in any way, creating a plurality ofcombinations from the descriptions presented above.

It will be further appreciated that embodiments of the present inventionmay be provided in the form of a service deployed on behalf of acustomer to offer service on demand.

While various embodiments have been described above, it should beunderstood that they have been presented by way of example only, and notlimitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of a preferred embodiment shouldnot be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, butshould be defined only in accordance with the following claims and theirequivalents.

What is claimed is:
 1. A system, comprising: a processor; and logicintegrated with and/or executable by the processor, wherein the logic isconfigured to cause the processor to: receive a set of data; and in aniterative process until a set of decoded data is output or apredetermined number of full iterations have occurred: C1 decode allfirst subsets of the set of data; determine whether to stop decoding theset of data after the C1 decoding; increment a half iteration counter toindicate completion of a half iteration; C2 decode all second subsets ofthe set of data two or more times in each half iteration using two ormore C2-decoding methods in response to a determination that a secondsubset is not decoded successfully using a first C2-decoding method;determine whether to stop decoding the set of data after the C2decoding; increment the half iteration counter to indicate completion ofanother half iteration; and output the set of decoded data in responseto a determination that all subsets of the set of data are decodedsuccessfully, wherein C1 decoding and C2 decoding are performed on theset of data as modified by any previous decoding attempts.
 2. The systemas recited in claim 1, wherein the logic configured to cause theprocessor to determine whether to stop decoding the set of data afterthe C1 decoding is further configured to cause the processor to:determine a number of remaining errors in each of the first subsets ofdata; continue decoding in response to a determination that the numberof remaining errors in one or more of the first subsets of data exceedsa number of correctable errors; and stop decoding in response to adetermination that the number of remaining errors in each of the firstsubsets of data is less than or equal to the number of correctableerrors; and wherein the logic configured to cause the processor todetermine whether to stop decoding the set of data after the C2 decodingis further configured to cause the processor to: determine a number ofremaining errors in each of the second subsets of data; continuedecoding when the number of remaining errors in one or more of thesecond subsets of data exceeds a number of correctable errors; and stopdecoding when the number of remaining errors in each of the secondsubsets of data is less than or equal to the number of correctableerrors.
 3. The system as recited in claim 1, wherein the logicconfigured to cause the processor to C1 decode all first subsets of theset of data is further configured to cause the processor to: set a C1iteration counter to zero and empty a first list; and in an iterativeprocess until the set of decoded data is output or a predeterminednumber of allowed C1 iterations have occurred: decode a C1-codewordusing a first C1-decoding method; determine whether to stop decoding theC1-codeword based on a number of errors remaining in the C1-codewordafter first decoding thereof; determine whether a number of elements ina second list is less than a first integer variable, the first integervariable being set to at least two; decode the C1-codeword using asecond C1-decoding method in response to a determination that the numberof elements in the second list is less than the first integer variable;determine whether the second decoding of the C1-codeword failed; add alocation of the C1-codeword to the first list when the second decodingof the C1-codeword failed; increment the C1 iteration counter toindicate completion of a C1 iteration; and stop C1 decoding in responseto a determination that the C1 iteration counter is greater than orequal to the predetermined number of allowed C1 iterations.
 4. Thesystem as recited in claim 1, wherein the logic configured to cause theprocessor to C2 decode all second subsets of the set of data is furtherconfigured to cause the processor to: set a C2 iteration counter to zeroand empty a second list; and in an iterative process until the set ofdecoded data is output or a predetermined number of allowed C2iterations have occurred: decode a C2-codeword using the firstC2-decoding method; determine whether to stop decoding the C2-codewordbased on a number of errors remaining in the C2-codeword after firstdecoding thereof; determine whether a number of elements in a first listis less than a second integer variable, the second integer variablebeing set to at least two; decode the C2-codeword using a secondC2-decoding method in response to a determination that the number ofelements in the first list is less than the second integer variable;determine whether the second decoding of the C2-codeword failed; add alocation of the C2-codeword to the second list when the second decodingof the C2-codeword failed; increment the C2 iteration counter toindicate completion of a C2 iteration; and stop C2 decoding in responseto a determination that the C2 iteration counter is greater than orequal to the predetermined number of allowed C2 iterations.
 5. Thesystem as recited in claim 1, wherein the set of data is arranged in adata array having rows and columns, wherein the first subset of data iseither the rows or the columns of the data array, wherein the secondsubset of data is the rows when the first subset is the columns, andwherein the second subset of data is the columns when the first subsetis the rows.
 6. The system as recited in claim 1, wherein the logicconfigured to cause the processor to C1 decode all first subsets of theset of data is further configured to cause the processor to: set a firstlist to empty; decode all C1-codewords using a first C1-decoding method;set a first failure variable as a number of C1-codewords which failed todecode successfully; decode a subset of C1-codewords using a secondC1-decoding method with erasure locations indicated in a second list,the subset of C1-codewords including all those C1-codewords which failedto C1 decode successfully in response to a determination that a numberof elements in the second list is less than a first integer variable;and update the first list to include all C1-codewords which failed tosuccessfully decode, wherein the first C1-decoding method is error-onlydecoding and the second C1-decoding method is error-and-erasuredecoding.
 7. The system as recited in claim 6, wherein the logicconfigured to cause the processor to C2 decode all second subsets of theset of data is further configured to cause the processor to: set thesecond list to empty; decode all C2-codewords using the firstC2-decoding method; set a second failure variable as a number ofC2-codewords which failed to decode successfully; decode a subset ofC2-codewords using a second C2-decoding method with erasure locationsindicated in the first list, the subset of C2-codewords including allthose C2-codewords which failed to C2 decode successfully in response toa determination that a number of elements in the first list is less thana second integer variable; and update the second list to include allC2-codewords which failed to successfully decode, wherein the firstC2-decoding method is error-only decoding and the second C2-decodingmethod is error-and-erasure decoding.
 8. A method, comprising: receivinga set of data; and in an iterative process until a set of decoded datais output or a predetermined number of full iterations have occurred: C1decoding all first subsets of the set of data; determining whether tostop decoding the set of data after the C1 decoding; incrementing a halfiteration counter to indicate completion of a half iteration; C2decoding all second subsets of the set of data two or more times in eachhalf iteration using two or more C2-decoding methods in response to adetermination that a second subset is not decoded successfully using afirst C2-decoding method; determining whether to stop decoding the setof data after the C2 decoding; incrementing the half iteration counterto indicate completion of another half iteration; and outputting the setof decoded data in response to a determination that all subsets of theset of data are decoded successfully, wherein C1 decoding and C2decoding are performed on the set of data as modified by any previousdecoding attempts.
 9. The method as recited in claim 8, wherein thedetermining whether to stop decoding the set of data after the C1decoding is further comprises: determine a number of remaining errors ineach of the first subsets of data; continue decoding in response to adetermination that the number of remaining errors in one or more of thefirst subsets of data exceeds a number of correctable errors; and stopdecoding in response to a determination that the number of remainingerrors in each of the first subsets of data is less than or equal to thenumber of correctable errors; and wherein the determining whether tostop decoding the set of data after the C2 decoding further comprises:determine a number of remaining errors in each of the second subsets ofdata; continue decoding in response to a determination that the numberof remaining errors in one or more of the second subsets of data exceedsa number of correctable errors; and stop decoding in response to adetermination that the number of remaining errors in each of the secondsubsets of data is less than or equal to the number of correctableerrors.
 10. The method as recited in claim 8, wherein the C1 decodingall first subsets of the set of data further comprises: setting a C1iteration counter to zero and empty a first list; and in an iterativeprocess until the set of decoded data is output or a predeterminednumber of allowed C1 iterations have occurred: decoding a C1-codewordusing a first C1-decoding method; determining whether to stop decodingthe C1-codeword based on a number of errors remaining in the C1-codewordafter first decoding thereof; determining whether a number of elementsin a second list is less than a first integer variable, the firstinteger variable being set to at least two; decoding the C1-codewordusing a second C1-decoding method in response to a determination thatthe number of elements in the second list is less than the first integervariable; determining whether the second decoding of the C1-codewordfailed; adding a location of the C1-codeword to the first list inresponse to a determination that the second decoding of the C1-codewordfailed; incrementing the C1 iteration counter to indicate completion ofa C1 iteration; and stopping C1 decoding in response to a determinationthat the C1 iteration counter is greater than or equal to thepredetermined number of allowed C1 iterations.
 11. The method as recitedin claim 8, wherein the C2 decoding all second subsets of the set ofdata further comprises: setting a C2 iteration counter to zero and emptya second list; and in an iterative process until the set of decoded datais output or a predetermined number of allowed C2 iterations haveoccurred: decoding a C2-codeword using the first C2-decoding method;determining whether to stop decoding the C2-codeword based on a numberof errors remaining in the C2-codeword after first decoding thereof;determining whether a number of elements in a first list is less than asecond integer variable, the second integer variable being set to atleast two; decoding the C2-codeword using a second C2-decoding method inresponse to a determination that the number of elements in the firstlist is less than the second integer variable; determining whether thesecond decoding of the C2-codeword failed; adding a location of theC2-codeword to the second list in response to a determination that thesecond decoding of the C2-codeword failed; incrementing the C2 iterationcounter to indicate completion of a C2 iteration; and stopping C2decoding in response to a determination that the C2 iteration counter isgreater than or equal to the predetermined number of allowed C2iterations.
 12. The method as recited in claim 8, wherein the set ofdata is arranged in a data array having rows and columns, wherein thefirst subset of data is either the rows or the columns of the dataarray, wherein the second subset of data is the rows when the firstsubset is the columns, and wherein the second subset of data is thecolumns when the first subset is the rows.
 13. The method as recited inclaim 8, wherein the C1 decoding all first subsets of the set of datafurther comprises: setting a first list to empty; decoding allC1-codewords using a first C1-decoding method; setting a first failurevariable as a number of C1-codewords which failed to decodesuccessfully; decoding a subset of C1-codewords using a secondC1-decoding method with erasure locations indicated in a second list,the subset of C1-codewords including all those C1-codewords which failedto C1 decode successfully in response to a determination that a numberof elements in the second list is less than a first integer variable;and updating the first list to include all C1-codewords which failed tosuccessfully decode, wherein the first C1-decoding method is error-onlydecoding and the second C1-decoding method is error-and-erasuredecoding.
 14. The method as recited in claim 13, wherein the C2 decodingall second subsets of the set of data further comprises: setting thesecond list to empty; decoding all C2-codewords using the firstC2-decoding method; setting a second failure variable as a number ofC2-codewords which failed to decode successfully; decoding a subset ofC2-codewords using a second C2-decoding method with erasure locationsindicated in the first list, the subset of C2-codewords including allthose C2-codewords which failed to C2 decode successfully in response toa determination that a number of elements in the first list is less thana second integer variable; and updating the second list to include allC2-codewords which failed to successfully decode, wherein the firstC2-decoding method is error-only decoding and the second C2-decodingmethod is error-and-erasure decoding.